Is BMC Biology A good journal?
The overall rank of BMC Biology is 395. According to SCImago Journal Rank (SJR), this journal is ranked 3.952. SCImago Journal Rank is an indicator, which measures the scientific influence of journals.
Is BMC a scientific journal?
BioMed Central (BMC) is a United Kingdom-based, for-profit scientific open access publisher that produces over 250 scientific journals. All its journals are published online only….BioMed Central.
Parent company | Springer Nature |
---|---|
Publication types | Scientific journals |
Nonfiction topics | Science |
Official website | www.biomedcentral.com |
Is Genome Biology A good journal?
The current impact factor is 13.583 (2020) * and the journal is ranked 3rd among research journals in the Genetics and Heredity category, and 2nd among research journals in the Biotechnology and Applied Microbiology category by Thomson Reuters. Genome Biology is the highest ranked open access journal in the category.
When did PLOS Genetics begin publishing?
OCLC no. PLOS Genetics is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal established in 2005 and published by the Public Library of Science.
What is BMC Public Health journal?
BMC Public Health is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on the epidemiology of disease and the understanding of all aspects of public health.
Is BMC a predatory journal?
Dear Alexandre Georges , While Publishers such as Frontiers In, PLoS, BMC exploit the open access model, using the open access model does not make you predatory… you may buy open access in Nature and in Science… these are not predatory.
Where can I publish my genome?
Reputable journals that currently publish genome reports (alongside other kinds of papers) include Genome Biology and Evolution (Oxford University Press), Molecular Ecology Resources (Wiley), Standards in Genomics Science (Springer) and The Journal of Biotechnology (Elsevier), to name but a few (Table 1).
Is Genome Biology peer-reviewed?
Genome Biology operates a transparent peer review system, where the reviewers are aware of the names and affiliations of the authors, but the reviewer reports provided to authors are anonymous.