What was Dostoevsky philosophy?
Dostoevsky was intimately familiar with two major philosophies: that of Orthodox Christianity and of Utopian Socialism. Each had its own specific and finely tuned understanding and justification of suffering, and each prescribed its own remedy.
Was Dostoevsky a radical?
Dostoevsky began participating in a radical intellectual discussion group called the Petrashevsky Circle. The group was suspected of subversive activites, which led to Dostoevsky’s arrest in 1849, and his sentencing to death.
Is Dostoevsky a romanticist?
Fyodor Dostoyevsky is described as a romantic realist in Donald Fanger’s book, Dostoevsky and Romantic Realism: A Study of Dostoevsky in Relation to Balzac, Dickens, and Gogol.
Is Fyodor Dostoevsky a philosophy?
| Fyodor Dostoevsky | |
|---|---|
| Education | Military Engineering-Technical University, St. Petersburg |
| Genre | Novel short story journalism |
| Subject | Philosophy Christianity Theology |
| Literary movement | Realism |
Was Dostoevsky a socialist?
The short answer is no. He was not a socialist. But he still defended them because he saw something honorable in their intentions.
Was Dostoevsky a nihilist?
The main protagonist, Rodion Raskolnikov, was presented as the nihilist archetype, and through his inconsistency, inner conflict, and irrational thinking, Dostoyevsky set out to prove that nihilism as a philosophy was flawed and had no place in Russian society.
Is Dostoevsky an existentialist?
Existentialism is a philosophy associated with those who share the belief that philosophical thinking begins not only with the thinking subject, but the human being in its entirety. The existentialist, including Dostoevsky, put their whole being into their works.
What is Kierkegaard’s paradox of faith?
Kierkegaard defines faith as “paradox” by which “the particular is higher than the universal.” This paradox leads Abraham, by virtue of the absurd, to the plane of faith. Rejecting Hegel’s universalism, Kierkegaard posits the existence of a religious plane that surpasses universal ethics.